Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

Did OPEC Just Admit Defeat In The Shale Oil Wars?

Published 11/13/2017, 12:38 AM
Updated 05/14/2017, 06:45 AM

Key Points:

  • OPEC quietly admits that its Shale Oil Strategy has failed.
  • ULCC static off Oman since 2015 offloads oil.
  • Imagery suggests Saudi Arabia could be fudging their inventory storage numbers.

The past week has been relatively interesting on the Crude Oil news front as OPEC quietly released their `’World Oil Outlook’ report. As usual, the cartel largely shrugged off the growing risk around the arrival of peak oil demand and largely painted a picture of improving price stability.

However, what was particularly illuminating is the fact that the cartel drastically revised upward their assessment of U.S. shale oil production. Subsequently, the question remains if OPEC is finally ready to admit defeat in their strategy to crush shale oil producers.

Surprisingly, it was only just last year that OPEC was pushing the narrative that shale oil production would be damaged by their strategy of flooding the markets with cheap oil. In fact, the cartel was almost smug in their view that shale production would continue to fall and by 2021 represent only 4.8 mb/d.

US Oil Production

However, clearly this hasn’t happened and new technology in shale production centers has increased productivity and the marginal cost of extraction for U.S. producers. Subsequently, even OPEC has now suggested in their latest modelling that they see shale output rising to around 7.5 mb/d by 2021. This is a whopping near-50% upward revision of shale output and quietly suggests that the cartel is finally abandoning the notion that they can drive U.S. shale producers out by flooding the market with supply.

Subsequently, the likelihood of OPEC extending their production caps well into next year is relatively strong but it remains to be seen if it will actually be effective in establishing higher oil prices. In fact, some interesting tidbits of intelligence released over the past week seem to suggest that not all is well in the land of Middle Eastern oil producers.

US Crude Oil Stocks

Last week also saw the FT reporting that satellite imagery showed the offloading of one of the largest tankers in the world, a ULCC that has been stationary off Oman since 2015. The crude was apparently being stored afloat for prices to increase to an advantageous level before being sold into the market. Subsequently, this may be an interesting sign that some of the biggest players in crude markets are looking at the present market and seeing prices forming a top.

In addition, the satellite imagery also shows a major oil storage facility in Saudi Arabia may actually have greater inventory than first thought (or reported). In a case of, a picture never lies, it would seem apparent that crude stocks have actually been rising at the facility in contrast to the official reports of a fall in inventories by over 70 million barrels since 2016. Subsequently, there is plenty of scope to disbelieve the Kingdom when it comes to both their production and storage figures.

Ultimately, the current drive in prices is largely being fueled by rising geopolitical risk within the House of Saud. Clearly, the purge that has gone on recently has seen prices spike due to many of the people that were considered as impediments to extending production caps having been removed from their respective positions.

These actions have seen plenty of speculation of WTI prices trading north of the $60.00 handle. However, it may really just be a case of the ‘emperor has no clothes’ as OPEC quietly admits that their strategy to crush shale oil has proved to be an unmitigated disaster. Subsequently, watch for a correction in crude prices over the next month as the market returns to the reality that is the ongoing rebalancing within crude oil markets.

Latest comments

I have been reading articles on how the Shale Producers have "won" the war against OPEC.  This argument doesn't hold a lot of water for me for a number of reasons:. . 1.  When you compare lifting costs - Most OPEC producers are still doing it much cheaper.  All it takes is to realize that they can produce at $10-$15 per well where shale is still in the $30-$40's.. . 2.  Rig Counts - Rig counts are followed by investors like the score of a basketball game- this simply shoiuld not be the case.  They will give you an indicator that activity is changing.  You need to look at new wells versus improved procution from existing wells.. . 3.  Debt burden - All one has to say is Chesapeake Energy.  Since 2014, many of the shale producers have had to take on mountains of debt to surve - this just doesn't look good to investors.  Unlike Exxon and Shell, most of the shale producers are financed by debt whereas the Big IOC's are self financed.  Investment has definitely slowed in the past few years.
Great Article
Good job, thank you
In my view OPEC was just polite. It is actually shale who could not fulfill the promise of cheap and abundant oil as it could not withstand prices below 50.Shale needed the help from OPEC to get up prices, otherwise shale would be even more in trouble.OPEC does not mind about the shale  production level as long as prices are around 60.
Shale producers have been drilling since $40.  They focused on areas that produced cheaply and as pipelines continue to get built from the more expensive areas, costs will come down and production will accelerate further.  Short spikes up in oil prices are likely, but the long-term trend is for the price to stay well under $80.... probably under $60.  Don't underestimate North American shale producers.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.